AI detection FAQ
Can AI detection be used as proof?
Quick answer
No. AI detection results are review evidence, not proof. They should inform a human decision alongside drafts, sources, and policy — not serve as the sole basis for an accusation.
Because detectors produce false positives and false negatives, a score alone cannot establish that a person used AI or committed misconduct. Treating it as proof risks unfair outcomes, especially for non-native writers and short or formulaic texts.
Sound practice uses detection as one input in a process: review flagged passages, ask about the writing process, compare against drafts and prior work, and apply the relevant policy with human judgment.
GPTZeroPro is built for this evidence-first workflow, prioritizing explainability and documented review over a single pass/fail number.
Check text with the AI detector
See explainable, passage-level evidence instead of a single score.
Open the AI detector